Samsung Galaxy M14 4G vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 37/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 424,216); the Vivo iQOO 16 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G is noticeably lighter (194g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M14 4G
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Samsung Galaxy M14 4G better?
- Lighter: 194g vs 223g
- Better portability (54/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 424216
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 412
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 1423
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 31/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 52 points higher (89/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (100/100 vs 31/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (78/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (90/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G is a bit better (54/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M14 4G | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 424216 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 412 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1423 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.7" PLS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, One UI 5.1 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×77.8×8.8 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M14 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M14 4G
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M14 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy M14 4G and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Samsung Galaxy M14 4G by 92.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy M14 4G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (100/100 vs 31/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (99/100 vs 54/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (78/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G (90/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G is a bit better (54/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G by 52 points (89/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Samsung Galaxy M14 4G has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 31/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.