Samsung Galaxy M13 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy M13 (2022) runs on the Samsung Exynos 850, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $149 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 31/100 (a 60-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 234,339); the Samsung Galaxy M13 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy M13
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 192g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $149 vs $950
- Better portability (68/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 234339
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 836
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 16/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M13 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 60 points higher (91/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 16/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy M13 — 38/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (99/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (89/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (68/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M13 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 850 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 234339 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 836 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $149 | $950 |
Samsung Galaxy M13
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy M13
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2408x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M13
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy M13 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy M13 by 94.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $801. Samsung Galaxy M13 was $801 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (99/100 vs 16/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (89/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (96/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (85/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (68/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M13 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 by 60 points (91/100 vs 31/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M13 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M13 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M13 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 16/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M13 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.