Samsung Galaxy M13 vs Vivo X500 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy M13 (2022) runs on the Samsung Exynos 850, while the Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro; launch prices were $149 and $970. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 31/100 (a 59-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 234,339).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M13
Vivo X500 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy M13 better?
- Cheaper at launch: $149 vs $970
- Better portability (68/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 234339
- Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 836
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 15W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 16/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M13 vs the Vivo X500 Pro, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 59 points higher (90/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (100/100 vs 16/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 51/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy M13 — 36/100, Vivo X500 Pro — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (100/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (94/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (81/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M13 | Vivo X500 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 850 | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | 234339 | 5016623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 4188 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 836 | 13145 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.4" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 1216x2660 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $149 | $970 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M13
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X500 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M13
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2408x1080
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2660
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M13
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy M13 and Vivo X500 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X500 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy M13 by 95.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $821. Samsung Galaxy M13 was $821 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (100/100 vs 16/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (94/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (87/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 (81/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M13 or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 by 59 points (90/100 vs 31/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M13 and the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Vivo X500 Pro — 90/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M13 or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M13 or the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 16/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M13 over the Vivo X500 Pro?
The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.