Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) vs Vivo iQOO 15

The Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 700, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 39/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,740,528 vs 515,647); the Vivo iQOO 15 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) is noticeably lighter (195g vs 215g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) by 47 points (86/100 vs 39/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India)
Performance 41
Display 44
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 53
Value for money
Vivo iQOO 15
Performance 94
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 85
Portability 48
Value for money 84
What makes Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) better?
  • Lighter: 195g vs 215g

  • Better portability (53/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3740528 vs 515647
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 688
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1794
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 41/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 47 points higher (86/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (94/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (94/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) is a bit better (53/100 vs 48/100).

Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India): The Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15: The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) Vivo iQOO 15
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 700 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 515647 3740528
Geekbench Single 688 3041
Geekbench Multi 1794 9494
Display 6.5" PLS LCD 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 720x1600 1440x3168
Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 15W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 5 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12, One UI 4.1 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 400 nits 6000 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 164.5×76.5×8.8 mm 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm
Weight 195 g 215 g
Launch price $599
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 5MP
30
camera
Vivo iQOO 15
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India)
  • 6.5" PLS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
44
display
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India)
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Vivo iQOO 15
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) MediaTek Dimensity 700
39/100
515647 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100 +86.2%
3740528 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 leads Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) by 86.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India)
Price unknown
Vivo iQOO 15
$599
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (94/100 vs 41/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (99/100 vs 44/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (78/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (85/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) is a bit better (53/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) by 47 points (86/100 vs 39/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) and the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) or the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on performance (94/100 vs 41/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) over the Vivo iQOO 15?

The Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.