Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 700, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 39/100 (a 50-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 515,647); the Vivo iQOO 16 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) is noticeably lighter (195g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India)
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) better?
- Lighter: 195g vs 223g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 515647
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 690
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 1736
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 40/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 50 points higher (89/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (100/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (90/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) is a bit better (53/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 700 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 515647 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 690 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1736 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.5" PLS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, One UI 4.1 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.5×76.5×8.8 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India)
- 6.5" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) by 90.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (100/100 vs 40/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (99/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (78/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) (90/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) is a bit better (53/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) by 50 points (89/100 vs 39/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M13 5G (India) over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.