Samsung Galaxy M07 vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung Galaxy M07 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $113 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 41/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 552,286); the Vivo iQOO 13 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M07 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy M07 is noticeably lighter (184g vs 207g).
Samsung Galaxy M07
Vivo iQOO 13
- Lighter: 184g vs 207g
- Cheaper: $113 vs $650
- Better portability (73/100 vs 55/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 552286
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 43/100)
- Better value for money (80/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M07 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 43 points higher (84/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 44/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (80/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (73/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (73/100 vs 55/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M07 | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 552286 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.7" PLS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 167.4×77.4×7.6 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 184 g | 207 g | |
| Price | $113 | $650 |
Samsung Galaxy M07
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy M07
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M07
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy M07 and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy M07 by 82.3% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $537. Samsung Galaxy M07 is cheaper by $537.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (92/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (99/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (78/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (73/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (73/100 vs 55/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M07 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 by 43 points (84/100 vs 41/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M07 and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy M07 has a MobileRank rating of 41/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M07 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M07 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (92/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M07 over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy M07 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.