Samsung Galaxy M07 vs Vivo iQOO 15T

The Samsung Galaxy M07 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $113 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 41/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15T is faster in AnTuTu (3,815,522 vs 552,286); the Vivo iQOO 15T has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M07 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy M07 is noticeably lighter (184g vs 216g).

The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 by 41 points (82/100 vs 41/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy M07
Performance 43
Display 43
Camera 30
Battery 44
Portability 73
Value for money 66
Vivo iQOO 15T
Performance 95
Display 99
Camera 65
Battery 75
Portability 44
Value for money 90
What makes Samsung Galaxy M07 better?
  • Lighter: 184g vs 216g
  • Cheaper: $113 vs $499

  • Better portability (73/100 vs 44/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15T better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3815522 vs 552286
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 727
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2047
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (65/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (75/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better value for money (90/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M07 vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 41 points higher (82/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (95/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (65/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 44/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (90/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (95/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (65/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (75/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (73/100 vs 44/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (90/100 vs 66/100).

Samsung Galaxy M07: The Samsung Galaxy M07 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 15T: The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy M07 Vivo iQOO 15T
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 552286 3815522
Geekbench Single 727 3228
Geekbench Multi 2047 9553
Display 6.7" PLS LCD 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 720x1600 1440x3168
Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 8000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 16 MP
RAM 4GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 Android 16
NFC no yes
Protection IP54 IP68
Dimensions 167.4×77.4×7.6 mm
Weight 184 g 216 g
Price $113 $499
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy M07
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Vivo iQOO 15T
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 16MP
65
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy M07
  • 6.7" PLS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display
Vivo iQOO 15T
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy M07
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery
Vivo iQOO 15T
  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
75
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy M07 and Vivo iQOO 15T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy M07 MediaTek Helio G99
41/100
552286 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15T MediaTek Dimensity 9500
82/100 +85.5%
3815522 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15T leads Samsung Galaxy M07 by 85.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy M07
$113
Vivo iQOO 15T
$499

Price difference: $386. Samsung Galaxy M07 is cheaper by $386.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (95/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (99/100 vs 43/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (65/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (75/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (73/100 vs 44/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 (90/100 vs 66/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M07 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M07 by 41 points (82/100 vs 41/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M07 and the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Samsung Galaxy M07 has a MobileRank rating of 41/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 82/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy M07 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on camera score (65/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy M07 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on performance (95/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M07 over the Vivo iQOO 15T?

The Samsung Galaxy M07 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.