Samsung Galaxy Fold vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy Fold (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 44/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4380); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 824,513); the Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably lighter (226g vs 263g).
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Vivo X300 Pro
- Overall rating 44/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 824513
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 968
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2731
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4380 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 226g vs 263g
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 54/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 20/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 38/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 77/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 20/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Fold vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 43 points higher (87/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (93/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (96/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (81/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (43/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Fold | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 824513 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 968 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2731 | 9553 | |
| Display | 7.3" Dynamic AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1536x2152 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4380 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.9×62.9×15.5 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 263 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy Fold
- Main: 12MP f/f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Fold
- 7.3" Dynamic AMOLED
- Resolution: 1536x2152
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Fold
- 4380 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Fold and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Fold by 74.8% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (93/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 77/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (96/100 vs 20/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (81/100 vs 38/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (43/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Fold or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold by 43 points (87/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Fold and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Fold or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 20/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Fold or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Fold over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.