Samsung Galaxy Fold vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Fold (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 44/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4380); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 824,513); the Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably lighter (230g vs 263g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy Fold better?
- Overall rating 44/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 824513
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 968
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2731
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4380 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 230g vs 263g
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 54/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 20/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 38/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 77/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Fold vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 47 points higher (91/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (99/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (96/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (85/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (39/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Fold | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 824513 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 968 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2731 | 11047 | |
| Display | 7.3" Dynamic AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1536x2152 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4380 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 160.9×62.9×15.5 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 263 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Fold
- Main: 12MP f/1.5
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Fold
- 7.3" Dynamic AMOLED
- Resolution: 1536x2152
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Fold
- 4380 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Fold and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Fold by 80.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (99/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 77/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (96/100 vs 20/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (85/100 vs 38/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (39/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold by 47 points (91/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Fold and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 20/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Fold over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.