Samsung Galaxy F70e vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy F70e (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $205 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 43/100 (a 48-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 528,398); the Samsung Galaxy F70e is noticeably lighter (199g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e by 48 points (91/100 vs 43/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy F70e

Performance 43
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 52
Portability 57
Value for money 46

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Samsung Galaxy F70e better?

  • Lighter: 199g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $205 vs $950

  • Better portability (57/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 528398
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1980
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 55/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F70e vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 48 points higher (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy F70e — 46/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e (85/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F70e notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (57/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy F70e Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 6300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 528398 4247433
Geekbench Single 771 3639
Geekbench Multi 1980 11047
Display 6.7" PLS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1600x720 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 800 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP69
Dimensions 167.4×77.4×8.2 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 199 g 230 g
Launch price $205 $950

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy F70e

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy F70e

  • 6.7" PLS LCD
  • Resolution: 1600x720
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy F70e

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy F70e and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy F70e MediaTek Dimensity 6300
43/100
528398 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +87.6%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy F70e by 87.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy F70e

$205

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $745. Samsung Galaxy F70e was $745 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e (99/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e (89/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e (96/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e (85/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F70e notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (57/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F70e or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e by 48 points (91/100 vs 43/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F70e and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy F70e has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy F70e or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy F70e or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F70e over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.