Samsung Galaxy F70e vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy F70e (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $205 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 43/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 528,398); the Samsung Galaxy F70e is noticeably lighter (199g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e by 46 points (89/100 vs 43/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy F70e

Performance 43
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 52
Portability 57
Value for money 46

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy F70e better?

  • Lighter: 199g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $205 vs $799

  • Better portability (57/100 vs 35/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 528398
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1980
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 55/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F70e vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 46 points higher (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy F70e — 46/100, Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e (92/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F70e notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (57/100 vs 35/100).

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy F70e Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 6300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 528398 4602290
Geekbench Single 771 3639
Geekbench Multi 1980 11047
Display 6.7" PLS LCD 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1600x720 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 7400 mAh
Charging 25W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB / 24GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 800 nits 8000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP68
Dimensions 167.4×77.4×8.2 mm 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm
Weight 199 g 227 g
Launch price $205 $799

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy F70e

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy F70e

  • 6.7" PLS LCD
  • Resolution: 1600x720
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy F70e

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy F70e and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy F70e MediaTek Dimensity 6300
43/100
528398 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +88.5%
4602290 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy F70e by 88.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy F70e

$205

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Launch price difference: $594. Samsung Galaxy F70e was $594 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e (99/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e (99/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e (78/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e (92/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F70e notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (57/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F70e or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F70e by 46 points (89/100 vs 43/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F70e and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy F70e has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy F70e or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy F70e or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F70e over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.