Samsung Galaxy F34 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy F34 (2023) runs on the Exynos 1280, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 49/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 613,957); the Samsung Galaxy F34 is noticeably lighter (208g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 by 42 points (91/100 vs 49/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy F34
Performance 47
Display 80
Camera 34
Battery 52
Portability 46
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Samsung Galaxy F34 better?
  • Lighter: 208g vs 230g

  • Better portability (46/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 613957
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 957
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2095
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 47/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F34 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 42 points higher (91/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (99/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (85/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F34 is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).

Samsung Galaxy F34: The Samsung Galaxy F34 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy F34 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Exynos 1280 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 613957 4247433
Geekbench Single 957 3640
Geekbench Multi 2095 11033
Display 6.5" Super AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2340 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, One UI 5.1 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 161.7×77.2×8.8 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 208 g 230 g
Launch price $950
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy F34
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
34
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy F34
  • 6.5" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy F34
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy F34 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy F34 Exynos 1280
49/100
613957 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +85.5%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy F34 by 85.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy F34
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (99/100 vs 47/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (96/100 vs 34/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (85/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F34 is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F34 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 by 42 points (91/100 vs 49/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F34 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy F34 has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy F34 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy F34 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 47/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F34 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy F34 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.