Samsung Galaxy F34 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy F34 (2023) runs on the Exynos 1280, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 49/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 615,425); the Samsung Galaxy F34 is noticeably lighter (208g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy F34
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy F34 better?
- Lighter: 208g vs 230g
- Better portability (46/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 615425
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 956
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2082
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F34 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 42 points higher (91/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (99/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (96/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (85/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F34 is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F34 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1280 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 615425 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 956 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2082 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.5" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.7×77.2×8.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 208 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy F34
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy F34
- 6.5" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy F34
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy F34 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy F34 by 85.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy F34
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (99/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (96/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (85/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F34 is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F34 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 by 42 points (91/100 vs 49/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F34 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy F34 has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy F34 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy F34 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F34 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.