Samsung Galaxy F34 vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Samsung Galaxy F34 (2023) runs on the Exynos 1280, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 49/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 615,425); the Samsung Galaxy F34 is noticeably lighter (208g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy F34
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Samsung Galaxy F34 better?
- Lighter: 208g vs 223g
- Better portability (46/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 615425
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 956
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 2082
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F34 vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 40 points higher (89/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (100/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (99/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (78/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F34 and the Vivo iQOO 16 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F34 | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1280 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 615425 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 956 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2082 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.5" Super AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, One UI 5.1 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.7×77.2×8.8 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 208 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy F34
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy F34
- 6.5" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy F34
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy F34 and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Samsung Galaxy F34 by 88.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy F34
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (100/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (99/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (78/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 (90/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F34 and the Vivo iQOO 16 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F34 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F34 by 40 points (89/100 vs 49/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F34 and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Samsung Galaxy F34 has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy F34 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy F34 or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F34 over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.