Samsung Galaxy F16 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy F16 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 45/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 528,398); the Samsung Galaxy F16 is noticeably lighter (191g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy F16
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy F16 better?
- Lighter: 191g vs 226g
- Better portability (65/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1980
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 67/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F16 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 43 points higher (88/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 (94/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 (84/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 (96/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F16 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (65/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F16 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 528398 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy F16
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy F16
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy F16
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy F16 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy F16 by 84.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy F16
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 (94/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 (84/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 (96/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 (81/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy F16 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (65/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F16 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 by 43 points (88/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F16 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy F16 has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy F16 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy F16 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F16 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.