Samsung Galaxy F16 vs Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy F16 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 24/100 (a 60-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 524,785); the Samsung Galaxy F16 is noticeably lighter (191g vs 227g).
Samsung Galaxy F16
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Lighter: 191g vs 227g
- Better design/ergonomics (61/100 vs 16/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1980
- Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (74/100 vs 28/100)
- Longer battery life (86/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy F16 vs the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 60 points higher (84/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (74/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 (97/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 (74/100 vs 28/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 (86/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy F16 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (61/100 vs 16/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy F16 | Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 524785 | 4602290 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7400 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB / 24GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 8000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 227 g | |
| Price | — | $799 |
Samsung Galaxy F16
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy F16
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy F16
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
- 7400 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Samsung Galaxy F16 and Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy F16 by 88.6% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy F16
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 (97/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 (74/100 vs 28/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 (86/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy F16 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (61/100 vs 16/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy F16 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F16 by 60 points (84/100 vs 24/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy F16 and the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy F16 has a MobileRank rating of 24/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy F16 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (74/100 vs 28/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy F16 or the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy F16 over the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy F16 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.