Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung Galaxy A72 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $450 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 46/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 514,398).
Samsung Galaxy A72
Vivo iQOO 13
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 203g vs 207g
- Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $650
- Overall rating 46/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 514398
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 746
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1762
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 41/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 36/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 68/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A72 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 38 points higher (84/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (92/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A72 — 24/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (92/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (99/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (78/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (73/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Samsung Galaxy A72 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A72 | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 514398 | 3119308 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1762 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 120W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 92 | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 165.0×77.4×8.4 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 203 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $450 | $650 |
Samsung Galaxy A72
- Main: 64MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A72
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A72
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy A72 and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy A72 by 83.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $200. Samsung Galaxy A72 was $200 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (92/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (99/100 vs 68/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (78/100 vs 36/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (73/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Samsung Galaxy A72 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A72 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 by 38 points (84/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A72 and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy A72 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A72 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 36/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A72 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (92/100 vs 41/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A72 over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy A72 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.