Samsung Galaxy A72 vs Vivo X300s

The Samsung Galaxy A72 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $450 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 46/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 514,398).

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 by 43 points (89/100 vs 46/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A72
Performance 41
Display 68
Camera 36
Battery 52
Portability 52
Value for money 24
Vivo X300s
Performance 94
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 90
What makes Samsung Galaxy A72 better?
  • Lighter: 203g vs 217g
  • Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $723

  • Better portability (52/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 514398
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 746
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1762
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 41/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 36/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A72 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 43 points higher (89/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 41/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A72 — 24/100, Vivo X300s — 90/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (94/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (94/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (94/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).

Samsung Galaxy A72: The Samsung Galaxy A72 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A72 Vivo X300s
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 514398 3703823
Geekbench Single 746 3228
Geekbench Multi 1762 9553
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2800x1260
Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 92
Main camera 64 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 8 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 50 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 800 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP67
Dimensions 165.0×77.4×8.4 mm
Weight 203 g 217 g
Launch price $450 $723
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A72
  • Main: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
36
camera
Vivo X300s
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A72
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
68
display
Vivo X300s
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A72
  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery
Vivo X300s
  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A72 and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A72 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
46/100
514398 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +86.1%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Samsung Galaxy A72 by 86.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A72
$450
Vivo X300s
$723

Launch price difference: $273. Samsung Galaxy A72 was $273 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (94/100 vs 41/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (94/100 vs 68/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (94/100 vs 36/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 (83/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A72 is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A72 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A72 by 43 points (89/100 vs 46/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A72 and the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy A72 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A72 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 36/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A72 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on performance (94/100 vs 41/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A72 over the Vivo X300s?

The Samsung Galaxy A72 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.