Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 vs Vivo iQOO 13

The Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (2017) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7880, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $459 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 18/100 (a 66-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 3600); the main camera is 16 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 is noticeably lighter (186g vs 207g).

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 by 66 points (84/100 vs 18/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A7 2017
Performance 1
Display 55
Camera 14
Battery 16
Portability 68
Value for money 0
Vivo iQOO 13
Performance 92
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 73
Portability 55
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 better?
  • Lighter: 186g vs 207g
  • Cheaper at launch: $459 vs $650

  • Better portability (68/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 175
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 760
  • Bigger battery: 6150 vs 3600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 16MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 1/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 14/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 16/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 66 points higher (84/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (92/100 vs 1/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 16/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 — 0/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (92/100 vs 1/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (78/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (73/100 vs 16/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).

Samsung Galaxy A7 2017: The Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 13: The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 Vivo iQOO 13
Processor Samsung Exynos 7880 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 3119308
Geekbench Single 175 3041
Geekbench Multi 760 9494
Display 5.7" Super AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1920x1080 1440x3168
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 3600 mAh 6150 mAh
Charging 15W 120W
Main camera 16 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 3GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 6.0 Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China)
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 156.8×77.6×7.9 mm 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm
Weight 186 g 207 g
Launch price $459 $650
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A7 2017
  • Main: 16MP f/1.9
  • Front: 16MP
14
camera
Vivo iQOO 13
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A7 2017
  • 5.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1920x1080
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
55
display
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A7 2017
  • 3600 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • Wireless charging: no data
16
battery
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6150 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A7 2017
$459
Vivo iQOO 13
$650

Launch price difference: $191. Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 was $191 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (92/100 vs 1/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (99/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (78/100 vs 14/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (73/100 vs 16/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 by 66 points (84/100 vs 18/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 and the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 14/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (92/100 vs 1/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 over the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.