Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 vs Vivo X Fold6

The Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (2017) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7880, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $459 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 18/100 (a 70-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 3600); the main camera is 16 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 7.9mm).

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 by 70 points (88/100 vs 18/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A7 2017
Performance 1
Display 55
Camera 14
Battery 16
Portability 68
Value for money 0
Vivo X Fold6
Performance 94
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 better?
  • Cheaper at launch: $459 vs $1900

  • Overall rating 18/100
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 175
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 760
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 3600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 16MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 1/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 14/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 16/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 70 points higher (88/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (94/100 vs 1/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 16/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 — 0/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (94/100 vs 1/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (81/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (87/100 vs 14/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (82/100 vs 16/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (100/100 vs 68/100).

Samsung Galaxy A7 2017: The Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 Vivo X Fold6
Processor Samsung Exynos 7880 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 3485039
Geekbench Single 175 3228
Geekbench Multi 760 9553
Display 5.7" Super AMOLED 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1920x1080 2480x2200
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3600 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 15W 80W
Wireless charging 50W
Main camera 16 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 20 MP
RAM 3GB 16GB
Storage 32GB 512GB
OS Android 6.0 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 156.8×77.6×7.9 mm 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 186 g
Launch price $459 $1900
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A7 2017
  • Main: 16MP f/1.9
  • Front: 16MP
14
camera
Vivo X Fold6
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A7 2017
  • 5.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1920x1080
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
55
display
Vivo X Fold6
  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A7 2017
  • 3600 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • Wireless charging: no data
16
battery
Vivo X Fold6
  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A7 2017
$459
Vivo X Fold6
$1900

Launch price difference: $1441. Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 was $1441 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (94/100 vs 1/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (81/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (87/100 vs 14/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (82/100 vs 16/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 (100/100 vs 68/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 by 70 points (88/100 vs 18/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 14/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (94/100 vs 1/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy A7 2017 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.