Samsung Galaxy A51 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy A51 (2020) runs on the Exynos 9611, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $399 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 34/100 (a 53-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 355,351); the Samsung Galaxy A51 is noticeably lighter (172g vs 226g).
Samsung Galaxy A51
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 172g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $899
- Better portability (77/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 355351
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 365
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1107
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 36/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 25/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A51 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 53 points higher (87/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 25/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A51 — 6/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 (93/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 (84/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 (96/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 (81/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A51 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (77/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A51 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 9611 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 355351 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 365 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1107 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.5×73.6×7.9 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 172 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy A51
- Main: 48MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A51
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A51
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A51 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A51 by 89.1% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $500. Samsung Galaxy A51 was $500 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 (93/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 (84/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 (96/100 vs 36/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 (81/100 vs 25/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A51 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (77/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A51 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 by 53 points (87/100 vs 34/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A51 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A51 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 36/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A51 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A51 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.