Samsung Galaxy A51 vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Samsung Galaxy A51 (2020) runs on the Exynos 9611, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $399 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 34/100 (a 50-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 355,351); the Samsung Galaxy A51 is noticeably lighter (172g vs 207g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A51
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Samsung Galaxy A51 better?
- Lighter: 172g vs 207g
- Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $650
- Better portability (77/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 355351
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 365
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1107
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 25/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 36/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 25/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A51 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 50 points higher (84/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 25/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A51 — 0/100, Vivo iQOO 13 — 82/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 (91/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 (99/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 (78/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 (73/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A51 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (77/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A51 | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 9611 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 355351 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 365 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1107 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 120W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.5×73.6×7.9 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 172 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | $650 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A51
- Main: 48MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A51
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A51
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A51 and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Samsung Galaxy A51 by 88.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $251. Samsung Galaxy A51 was $251 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 (91/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 (99/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 (78/100 vs 36/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 (73/100 vs 25/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A51 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (77/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A51 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A51 by 50 points (84/100 vs 34/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A51 and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A51 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 36/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A51 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A51 over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.