Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Vivo Y23 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy A35 (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1380, while the Vivo Y23 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A35 leads — 31/100 vs 22/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A35 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4300); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A35 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y23 Pro doesn't; the Vivo Y23 Pro is noticeably lighter (171g vs 209g).

The Samsung Galaxy A35 edges out the Vivo Y23 Pro by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A35
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 29
Battery 37
Design 38
Value for money 82
Vivo Y23 Pro
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 52
Battery 19
Design 86
Value for money 55
What makes Samsung Galaxy A35 better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4300 mAh

  • Longer battery life (37/100 vs 19/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (82/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo Y23 Pro better?
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 171g vs 209g

  • Better camera (52/100 vs 29/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (86/100 vs 38/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A35 vs the Vivo Y23 Pro, the Samsung Galaxy A35 scores 9 points higher (31/100 vs 22/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro leads (52/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 leads (37/100 vs 19/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 leads (82/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y23 Pro (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (52/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 notably outperforms the Vivo Y23 Pro (37/100 vs 19/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (86/100 vs 38/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 notably outperforms the Vivo Y23 Pro (82/100 vs 55/100).

Samsung Galaxy A35: The Samsung Galaxy A35 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo Y23 Pro: The Vivo Y23 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A35 Vivo Y23 Pro
Processor Samsung Exynos 1380 MediaTek Dimensity 1200 ()
AnTuTu 745265
Geekbench Single 900
Geekbench Multi 2800
Display 6.6" Super AMOLED 6.6"
Resolution 2340x1080 1080x2376
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4300 mAh
Charging 25W
Main camera 50 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 8 MP
Front camera 13 MP 50 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB
OS Android 14 / One UI 6.1 Android 12 Snow Cone
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP67
Dimensions 161.7×78.0×8.2 mm 159.5×73.3×7.4 mm
Weight 209 g 171 g
Price $399
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A35
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
29
camera
Vivo Y23 Pro
  • Main: 108MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 50MP
52
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A35
  • 6.6" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Vivo Y23 Pro
  • 6.6"
  • Resolution: 1080x2376
  • Refresh rate: —
0
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A35
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
37
battery
Vivo Y23 Pro
  • 4300 mAh
  • No wireless charging
19
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy A35
$399
Vivo Y23 Pro
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y23 Pro (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (52/100 vs 29/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 notably outperforms the Vivo Y23 Pro (37/100 vs 19/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A35 (86/100 vs 38/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 notably outperforms the Vivo Y23 Pro (82/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo Y23 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A35 edges out the Vivo Y23 Pro by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Vivo Y23 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A35 has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Vivo Y23 Pro — 22/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo Y23 Pro?

The Vivo Y23 Pro leads on camera score (52/100 vs 29/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A35 over the Vivo Y23 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A35 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y23 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.