Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Vivo Y77 (China)
The Samsung Galaxy A35 (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1380, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A35 leads — 50/100 vs 45/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A35 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the Samsung Galaxy A35 is faster in AnTuTu (739,266 vs 593,307); the Samsung Galaxy A35 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't; the Vivo Y77 (China) is noticeably lighter (194g vs 209g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A35
Vivo Y77 (China)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A35 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 739266 vs 593307
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2800 vs 2299
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Higher performance (52/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (34/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 66/100)
What makes Vivo Y77 (China) better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 915 vs 900
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Lighter: 194g vs 209g
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 44/100)
- Better portability (56/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A35 vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Samsung Galaxy A35 scores 5 points higher (50/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is a bit better (52/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (34/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Samsung Galaxy A35 are nearly equal (45/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Vivo Y77 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1380 | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | |
| AnTuTu | 739266 | 593307 | |
| Geekbench Single | 900 | 915 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2800 | 2299 | |
| Display | 6.6" Super AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14 / One UI 6.1 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP67 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.7×78.0×8.2 mm | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A35
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A35
- 6.6" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A35
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A35 and Vivo Y77 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy A35 leads Vivo Y77 (China) by 24.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y77 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is a bit better (52/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is a bit better (79/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (34/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Samsung Galaxy A35 are nearly equal (45/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy A35 edges out the Vivo Y77 (China) by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy A35 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 45/100.
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy A35 leads on performance (52/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A35 over the Vivo Y77 (China)?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Samsung Galaxy A35 (79/100 vs 66/100).