Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Vivo Y77 (China)

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 45/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,463,142 vs 593,307); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't; the Vivo Y77 (China) is noticeably lighter (194g vs 214g).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) by 39 points (84/100 vs 45/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Performance 96
Display 88
Camera 86
Battery 61
Portability 51
Value for money 78

Vivo Y77 (China)

Performance 47
Display 66
Camera 30
Battery 45
Portability 56
Value for money —

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3463142 vs 593307
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 915
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 2299
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 47/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (61/100 vs 45/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 66/100)

What makes Vivo Y77 (China) better?

  • Faster charging: 80W vs 60W
  • Lighter: 194g vs 214g

  • Better portability (56/100 vs 51/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 39 points higher (84/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (96/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (88/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (61/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Vivo Y77 (China)
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 930
AnTuTu 3463142 593307
Geekbench Single 3601 915
Geekbench Multi 10686 2299
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.6" IPS LCD
Resolution 3120x1440 1080x2388
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 60W 80W
Wireless charging 25W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 157 —
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 12 MP 8 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 6GB / 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 12, Origin OS Ocean
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits —
NFC yes no
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm
Weight 214 g 194 g
Launch price $1299 —

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera

Vivo Y77 (China)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Vivo Y77 (China)

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2388
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery

Vivo Y77 (China)

  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
45
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Vivo Y77 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100
3463142 AnTuTu
Vivo Y77 (China) MediaTek Dimensity 930
45/100 -483.7%
593307 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Vivo Y77 (China) by 483.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

$1299

Vivo Y77 (China)

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (96/100 vs 47/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (88/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (86/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (61/100 vs 45/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) by 39 points (84/100 vs 45/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 45/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 47/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Vivo Y77 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.