Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Vivo Y53t 5G

The Samsung Galaxy A35 (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1380, while the Vivo Y53t 5G (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 700 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A35 leads — 50/100 vs 35/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A35 is faster in AnTuTu (739,266 vs 515,647); the Samsung Galaxy A35 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y53t 5G doesn't; the Vivo Y53t 5G is noticeably lighter (186g vs 209g).

The Samsung Galaxy A35 is noticeably better than the Vivo Y53t 5G — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy A35

Performance 52
Display 79
Camera 34
Battery 44
Portability 51
Value for money 28

Vivo Y53t 5G

Performance 40
Display 39
Camera 10
Battery 52
Portability 65
Value for money —

What makes Samsung Galaxy A35 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 739266 vs 515647
  • Better Geekbench Single: 900 vs 690
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2800 vs 1736
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP

  • Higher performance (52/100 vs 40/100)
  • Better camera (34/100 vs 10/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo Y53t 5G better?

  • Lighter: 186g vs 209g

  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better portability (65/100 vs 51/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A35 vs the Vivo Y53t 5G, the Samsung Galaxy A35 scores 15 points higher (50/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 leads (52/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 leads (34/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y53t 5G (79/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 notably outperforms the Vivo Y53t 5G (34/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G is a bit better (65/100 vs 51/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy A35 Vivo Y53t 5G
Processor Samsung Exynos 1380 MediaTek Dimensity 700 ()
AnTuTu 739266 515647
Geekbench Single 900 690
Geekbench Multi 2800 1736
Display 6.6" Super AMOLED 6.5" LCD IPS
Resolution 2340x1080 720x1600
Refresh rate 120 Hz —
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 25W —
Main camera 50 MP 13 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 0 MP
Front camera 13 MP 5 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB —
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB
OS Android 14 / One UI 6.1 Android 13
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits —
NFC yes no
Protection IP67 —
Dimensions 161.7×78.0×8.2 mm 75.6×164.1×8.2 mm
Weight 209 g 186 g
Launch price $399 —

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy A35

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 13MP
34
camera

Vivo Y53t 5G

  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy A35

  • 6.6" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Vivo Y53t 5G

  • 6.5" LCD IPS
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
39
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy A35

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery

Vivo Y53t 5G

  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A35 and Vivo Y53t 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A35 Samsung Exynos 1380
50/100
739266 AnTuTu
Vivo Y53t 5G MediaTek Dimensity 700 ()
35/100 -43.4%
515647 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy A35 leads Vivo Y53t 5G by 43.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy A35

$399

Vivo Y53t 5G

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y53t 5G (79/100 vs 39/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 notably outperforms the Vivo Y53t 5G (34/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y53t 5G is a bit better (65/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo Y53t 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy A35 is noticeably better than the Vivo Y53t 5G — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Vivo Y53t 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy A35 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo Y53t 5G — 35/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo Y53t 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy A35 leads on camera score (34/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo Y53t 5G?

The Samsung Galaxy A35 leads on performance (52/100 vs 40/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A35 over the Vivo Y53t 5G?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Samsung Galaxy A35 (79/100 vs 39/100).