Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
The Samsung Galaxy A35 (2024) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1380, while the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1300. Both devices score the same overall rating of 31/100. Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Samsung Galaxy A35 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A35 is thinner (8.2mm vs 9.2mm).
Samsung Galaxy A35
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Better camera (29/100 vs 27/100)
- Better value for money (82/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 44W vs 25W
- Lighter: 203g vs 209g
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 37/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (46/100 vs 38/100)
The Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) received the same MobileRank rating — 31/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 leads (82/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) are nearly equal (29/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (46/100 vs 38/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (82/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1380 | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | |
| AnTuTu | 745265 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 900 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2800 | — | |
| Display | 6.6" Super AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 / One UI 6.1 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP67 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.7×78.0×8.2 mm | 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 203 g | |
| Price | $399 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A35
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A35
- 6.6" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A35
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) are nearly equal (29/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (46/100 vs 38/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A35 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (82/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A35 or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
Both devices scored 31/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A35 and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Samsung Galaxy A35 has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) — 31/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A35 over the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?
The Samsung Galaxy A35 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a better fit for everyday use.