Samsung Galaxy A20 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy A20 (2019) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7884, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $190 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 19/100 (a 69-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A20 is noticeably lighter (169g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A20
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy A20 better?
- Lighter: 169g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $190 vs $899
- Better portability (79/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 254
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 802
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 2/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 25/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A20 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 69 points higher (88/100 vs 19/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 2/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 25/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A20 — 2/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (94/100 vs 2/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (84/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (81/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A20 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (79/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A20 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 7884 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 254 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 802 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.4" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×74.7×7.8 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 169 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $190 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A20
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A20
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A20
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $709. Samsung Galaxy A20 was $709 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (94/100 vs 2/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (84/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (81/100 vs 25/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A20 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (79/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A20 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 by 69 points (88/100 vs 19/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A20 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A20 has a MobileRank rating of 19/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A20 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A20 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 2/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A20 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.