Samsung Galaxy A20 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy A20 (2019) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7884, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $190 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 19/100 (a 68-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A20 is noticeably lighter (169g vs 226g).
Samsung Galaxy A20
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 169g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $190 vs $899
- Better portability (79/100 vs 43/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 254
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 802
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 2/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 25/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 4/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A20 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 68 points higher (87/100 vs 19/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 2/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 25/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 4/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (93/100 vs 2/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (84/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (81/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A20 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (79/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (86/100 vs 4/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A20 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 7884 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 254 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 802 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.4" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | — | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | — | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×74.7×7.8 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 169 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $190 | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy A20
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A20
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A20
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Launch price difference: $709. Samsung Galaxy A20 was $709 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (93/100 vs 2/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (84/100 vs 51/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (81/100 vs 25/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A20 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (79/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (86/100 vs 4/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A20 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 by 68 points (87/100 vs 19/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A20 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A20 has a MobileRank rating of 19/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A20 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A20 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 2/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A20 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A20 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.