Samsung Galaxy A20 vs Vivo iQOO 13

The Samsung Galaxy A20 (2019) runs on the Samsung Exynos 7884, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $190 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 19/100 (a 65-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A20 is noticeably lighter (169g vs 207g).

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 by 65 points (84/100 vs 19/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A20
Performance 2
Display 51
Camera 10
Battery 25
Portability 79
Value for money 4
Vivo iQOO 13
Performance 92
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 73
Portability 55
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy A20 better?
  • Lighter: 169g vs 207g
  • Cheaper at launch: $190 vs $650

  • Better portability (79/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 254
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 802
  • Bigger battery: 6150 vs 4000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 2/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 25/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better value for money (80/100 vs 4/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A20 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 65 points higher (84/100 vs 19/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (92/100 vs 2/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 25/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (80/100 vs 4/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (92/100 vs 2/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (99/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (73/100 vs 25/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A20 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (79/100 vs 55/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (80/100 vs 4/100).

Samsung Galaxy A20: The Samsung Galaxy A20 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 13: The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A20 Vivo iQOO 13
Processor Samsung Exynos 7884 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 3119308
Geekbench Single 254 3041
Geekbench Multi 802 9494
Display 6.4" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3168
Refresh rate 60 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 6150 mAh
Charging 120W
Main camera 13 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 3GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China)
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 158.4×74.7×7.8 mm 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm
Weight 169 g 207 g
Launch price $190 $650
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A20
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 8MP
10
camera
Vivo iQOO 13
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A20
  • 6.4" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
51
display
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A20
  • 4000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
25
battery
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6150 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A20
$190
Vivo iQOO 13
$650

Launch price difference: $460. Samsung Galaxy A20 was $460 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (92/100 vs 2/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (99/100 vs 51/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (78/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (73/100 vs 25/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A20 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 13 (79/100 vs 55/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 (80/100 vs 4/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A20 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A20 by 65 points (84/100 vs 19/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A20 and the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy A20 has a MobileRank rating of 19/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A20 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A20 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (92/100 vs 2/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A20 over the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Samsung Galaxy A20 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.