Samsung Galaxy A16 vs Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)

The Samsung Galaxy A16 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads — 31/100 vs 25/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Samsung Galaxy A16 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A16 is thinner (7.9mm vs 9.2mm).

The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) edges out the Samsung Galaxy A16 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A16
Performance 0
Display 50
Camera 24
Battery 37
Design 50
Value for money 97
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 27
Battery 51
Design 46
Value for money 55
What makes Samsung Galaxy A16 better?
  • Lighter: 200g vs 203g

  • Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better value for money (97/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) better?
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 44W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
  • Longer battery life (51/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A16 vs the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022), the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) scores 6 points higher (31/100 vs 25/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) leads (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 leads (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy A16 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) are nearly equal (50/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (97/100 vs 55/100).

Samsung Galaxy A16: The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022): The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A16 Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 MediaTek Dimensity 1300
AnTuTu 503850
Geekbench Single 760
Geekbench Multi 1890
Display 6.7" Super AMOLED 6.6" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2340 1080x2408
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 25W 44W
DXOMark (camera) 77
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 0 MP
Front camera 13 MP 16 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 6GB / 8GB / 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 Android 12, Funtouch 12
NFC yes no
Protection IP54
Dimensions 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm
Weight 200 g 203 g
Price $182
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
24
camera
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 16MP
27
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16
  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
50
display
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2408
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A16
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
37
battery
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 44W
  • No wireless charging
51
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy A16
$182
Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (100/100 vs 50/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy A16 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) are nearly equal (50/100 vs 46/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) (97/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?

The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) edges out the Samsung Galaxy A16 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A16 and the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?

The Samsung Galaxy A16 has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) — 31/100.

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A16 over the Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022)?

The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo iQOO Z5 (2022) is a better fit for everyday use.