Samsung Galaxy A16 vs Vivo Y77 (China)
The Samsung Galaxy A16 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads — 29/100 vs 25/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A16 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the Samsung Galaxy A16 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy A16
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Better value for money (97/100 vs 55/100)
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 194g vs 200g
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (57/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A16 vs the Vivo Y77 (China), the Vivo Y77 (China) scores 4 points higher (29/100 vs 25/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 leads (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Samsung Galaxy A16 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (57/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (97/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A16 | Vivo Y77 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | |
| AnTuTu | 503850 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 760 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1890 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 80W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 77 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 194 g | |
| Price | $182 | — |
Samsung Galaxy A16
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A16
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A16
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the Samsung Galaxy A16 are nearly equal (39/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (57/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (97/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Vivo Y77 (China) edges out the Samsung Galaxy A16 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A16 and the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy A16 has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo Y77 (China) — 29/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A16 over the Vivo Y77 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.