Samsung Galaxy A16 vs Vivo Y23 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy A16 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo Y23 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A16 leads — 25/100 vs 22/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A16 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4300); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A16 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y23 Pro doesn't; the Vivo Y23 Pro is noticeably lighter (171g vs 200g).

The Samsung Galaxy A16 edges out the Vivo Y23 Pro by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A16
Performance 0
Display 50
Camera 24
Battery 37
Design 50
Value for money 97
Vivo Y23 Pro
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 52
Battery 19
Design 86
Value for money 55
What makes Samsung Galaxy A16 better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4300 mAh

  • Longer battery life (37/100 vs 19/100)
  • Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (97/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo Y23 Pro better?
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 171g vs 200g

  • Better camera (52/100 vs 24/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (86/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A16 vs the Vivo Y23 Pro, the Samsung Galaxy A16 scores 3 points higher (25/100 vs 22/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro leads (52/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 leads (37/100 vs 19/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 leads (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y23 Pro (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (52/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 notably outperforms the Vivo Y23 Pro (37/100 vs 19/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (86/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y23 Pro (97/100 vs 55/100).

Samsung Galaxy A16: The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo Y23 Pro: The Vivo Y23 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A16 Vivo Y23 Pro
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 MediaTek Dimensity 1200 ()
AnTuTu 503850
Geekbench Single 760
Geekbench Multi 1890
Display 6.7" Super AMOLED 6.6"
Resolution 1080x2340 1080x2376
Refresh rate 90 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4300 mAh
Charging 25W
DXOMark (camera) 77
Main camera 50 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 8 MP
Front camera 13 MP 50 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB
OS Android 14, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 Android 12 Snow Cone
NFC yes no
Protection IP54
Dimensions 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm 159.5×73.3×7.4 mm
Weight 200 g 171 g
Price $182
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
24
camera
Vivo Y23 Pro
  • Main: 108MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 50MP
52
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A16
  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
50
display
Vivo Y23 Pro
  • 6.6"
  • Resolution: 1080x2376
  • Refresh rate: —
0
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A16
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
37
battery
Vivo Y23 Pro
  • 4300 mAh
  • No wireless charging
19
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy A16
$182
Vivo Y23 Pro
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y23 Pro (50/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (52/100 vs 24/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 notably outperforms the Vivo Y23 Pro (37/100 vs 19/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (86/100 vs 50/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y23 Pro (97/100 vs 55/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Vivo Y23 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A16 edges out the Vivo Y23 Pro by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A16 and the Vivo Y23 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A16 has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Vivo Y23 Pro — 22/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A16 or the Vivo Y23 Pro?

The Vivo Y23 Pro leads on camera score (52/100 vs 24/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A16 over the Vivo Y23 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y23 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.