Samsung Galaxy A15 vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy A15 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $200 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 47/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 503,308); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 83); the Samsung Galaxy A15 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 by 40 points (87/100 vs 47/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A15
Performance 42
Display 68
Camera 29
Battery 66
Portability 60
Value for money 56
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Samsung Galaxy A15 better?
  • Lighter: 200g vs 226g
  • Cheaper: $200 vs $899

  • Better portability (60/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 503308
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 727
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2047
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 29/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A15 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 40 points higher (87/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 (93/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 (84/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 (86/100 vs 56/100).

Samsung Galaxy A15: The Samsung Galaxy A15 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A15 Vivo X300 Pro
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 503308 3269794
Geekbench Single 727 3228
Geekbench Multi 2047 9553
Display 6.5" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2800
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 90W
Wireless charging 40W
DXOMark (camera) 83 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 200 g 226 g
Price $200 $899
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A15
  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 13MP
29
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A15
  • 6.5" AMOLED
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
68
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A15
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
66
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A15 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A15 MediaTek Helio G99
47/100
503308 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +84.6%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A15 by 84.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy A15
$200
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Price difference: $699. Samsung Galaxy A15 is cheaper by $699.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 (93/100 vs 42/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 (84/100 vs 68/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 (96/100 vs 29/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 (81/100 vs 66/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (60/100 vs 43/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 (86/100 vs 56/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A15 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 by 40 points (87/100 vs 47/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A15 and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A15 has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A15 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 29/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A15 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 42/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A15 over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A15 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.