Nokia G400 vs Samsung Galaxy A15
The Nokia G400 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the Samsung Galaxy A15 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A15 leads — 48/100 vs 43/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A15 is faster in AnTuTu (554,590 vs 477,542).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia G400
Samsung Galaxy A15
What makes Nokia G400 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 746 vs 727
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 198g vs 200g
- Better camera (33/100 vs 31/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A15 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 554590 vs 477542
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2047 vs 1816
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (43/100 vs 41/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (68/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia G400 vs the Samsung Galaxy A15, the Samsung Galaxy A15 scores 5 points higher (48/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 leads (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 41/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the Samsung Galaxy A15 are nearly equal (33/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (66/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia G400 | Samsung Galaxy A15 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 554590 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 727 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 2047 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.5" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×76.7×8.8 mm | — | |
| Weight | 198 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | — | $200 |
Camera comparison
Nokia G400
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy A15
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Display comparison
Nokia G400
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A15
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia G400
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A15
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia G400 and Samsung Galaxy A15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy A15 leads Nokia G400 by 13.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia G400
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 41/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 and the Nokia G400 are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia G400 and the Samsung Galaxy A15 are nearly equal (33/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 notably outperforms the Nokia G400 (66/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia G400 or the Samsung Galaxy A15?
The Samsung Galaxy A15 edges out the Nokia G400 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia G400 and the Samsung Galaxy A15?
The Nokia G400 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Samsung Galaxy A15 — 48/100.
Should you choose the Nokia G400 over the Samsung Galaxy A15?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Samsung Galaxy A15 (66/100 vs 43/100).