Samsung Galaxy A15 4G vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

The Samsung Galaxy A15 4G (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 45/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 554,590); the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G is noticeably lighter (200g vs 309g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G by 24 points (69/100 vs 45/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy A15 4G

Performance 43
Display 68
Camera 33
Battery 44
Portability 55
Value for money —

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

Performance 90
Display 70
Camera 52
Battery 63
Portability 20
Value for money 46

What makes Samsung Galaxy A15 4G better?

  • Lighter: 200g vs 309g

  • Better portability (55/100 vs 20/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 554590
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 727
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2047
  • Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (52/100 vs 33/100)
  • Longer battery life (63/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (70/100 vs 68/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 24 points higher (69/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G (90/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G are nearly equal (70/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G (52/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G (63/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 20/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold: The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy A15 4G Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 554590 2926532
Geekbench Single 727 3013
Geekbench Multi 2047 9287
Display 6.5" Super AMOLED 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1080x2340 2160x1584
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5600 mAh
Charging 25W 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 13 MP 10 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 512GB
OS Android 14, One UI 6 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 800 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP48
Dimensions 160.1×76.8×8.4 mm 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm
Weight 200 g 309 g
Launch price — $2899

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy A15 4G

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
33
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
52
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy A15 4G

  • 6.5" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
68
display

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
70
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy A15 4G

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
63
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A15 4G and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A15 4G MediaTek Helio G99
45/100
554590 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
69/100 +81.0%
2926532 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Samsung Galaxy A15 4G by 81.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy A15 4G

Price unknown

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

$2899

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G (90/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G are nearly equal (70/100 vs 68/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G (52/100 vs 33/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G (63/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G by 24 points (69/100 vs 45/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy A15 4G has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 33/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.