Samsung Galaxy A14 vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy A14 (2023) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $200 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 39/100 (a 49-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 607,489); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 67); the Samsung Galaxy A14 is noticeably lighter (201g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 by 49 points (88/100 vs 39/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy A14

Performance 46
Display 54
Camera 16
Battery 43
Portability 46
Value for money 38

Vivo X300 Pro

Performance 94
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 88

What makes Samsung Galaxy A14 better?

  • Lighter: 201g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $899

  • Better portability (46/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 607489
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 960
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1826
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 16/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 54/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A14 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 49 points higher (88/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A14 — 38/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (94/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (84/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (96/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A14 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).

Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy A14 Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Samsung Exynos 1330 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 607489 3326259
Geekbench Single 960 3293
Geekbench Multi 1826 10243
Display 6.6" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2408 1260x2800
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 15W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 67 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, One UI 5 Android 16
Brightness (peak) — 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP68
Dimensions 167.7×78.0×9.1 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 201 g 226 g
Launch price $200 $899

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy A14

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
16
camera

Vivo X300 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy A14

  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2408
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
54
display

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy A14

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Vivo X300 Pro

  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A14 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A14 Samsung Exynos 1330
39/100
607489 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
88/100 +81.7%
3326259 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A14 by 81.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy A14

$200

Vivo X300 Pro

$899

Launch price difference: $699. Samsung Galaxy A14 was $699 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (94/100 vs 46/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (84/100 vs 54/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (96/100 vs 16/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (81/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A14 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A14 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 by 49 points (88/100 vs 39/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A14 and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A14 has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A14 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 16/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A14 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 46/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A14 over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.