Samsung Galaxy A14 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy A14 (2023) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $129 and $10498. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 39/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 607,137); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 67); the Samsung Galaxy A14 is noticeably lighter (201g vs 230g).
Samsung Galaxy A14
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 201g vs 230g
- Cheaper: $129 vs $10498
- Better portability (46/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 607137
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 952
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1963
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 47/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 16/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 54/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A14 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 52 points higher (91/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (99/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (89/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (96/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (85/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A14 is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (86/100 vs 58/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A14 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1330 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 607137 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 952 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1963 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 67 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 167.7×78.0×9.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $129 | $10498 |
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A14
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A14
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A14 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A14 by 85.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $10369. Samsung Galaxy A14 is cheaper by $10369.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (99/100 vs 47/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (89/100 vs 54/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (96/100 vs 16/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (85/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A14 is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (86/100 vs 58/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A14 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 by 52 points (91/100 vs 39/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A14 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A14 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 16/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A14 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 47/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A14 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.