Samsung Galaxy A14 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Samsung Galaxy A14 (2023) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $200 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 39/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 607,489); the Samsung Galaxy A14 is noticeably lighter (201g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A14
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Samsung Galaxy A14 better?
- Lighter: 201g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $2899
- Better portability (46/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 607489
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 960
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1826
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 16/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A14 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 30 points higher (69/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A14 — 38/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (90/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (70/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (52/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (63/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A14 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (46/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A14 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1330 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 607489 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 960 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1826 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 67 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 167.7×78.0×9.1 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 201 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $200 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A14
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A14
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A14
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy A14 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Samsung Galaxy A14 by 79.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2699. Samsung Galaxy A14 was $2699 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (90/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (70/100 vs 54/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (52/100 vs 16/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (63/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A14 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (46/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A14 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 by 30 points (69/100 vs 39/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A14 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A14 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 16/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A14 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A14 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.