Samsung Galaxy A05 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Samsung Galaxy A05 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 33/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 346,495); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A05 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A05 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy A05
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 195g vs 309g
- Better portability (53/100 vs 20/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 346495
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 420
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1364
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 32/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A05 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 36 points higher (69/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A05 (91/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A05 (70/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A05 (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A05 (63/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A05 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (53/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A05 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 346495 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 420 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1364 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.7" | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 168.8×78.2×8.8 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Samsung Galaxy A05
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy A05
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A05
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Samsung Galaxy A05 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Samsung Galaxy A05 by 88.2% in our overall performance rating.
Samsung Galaxy A05
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A05 (91/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A05 (70/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A05 (52/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A05 (63/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A05 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (53/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A05 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A05 by 36 points (69/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A05 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy A05 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A05 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A05 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A05 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy A05 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.