Samsung Galaxy A03 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A03 (2022) and the ZTE Blade A75 4G (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade A75 4G leads — 25/100 vs 16/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the ZTE Blade A75 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy A03
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Overall rating 16/100
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Lighter: 189g vs 196g
- Better camera (24/100 vs 23/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (63/100 vs 55/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A03 vs the ZTE Blade A75 4G, the ZTE Blade A75 4G scores 9 points higher (25/100 vs 16/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G and the Samsung Galaxy A03 are nearly equal (24/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100. In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is a bit better (63/100 vs 55/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A03 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 330006 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.5" PLS TFT | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 5W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | 164.1×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 196 g | 189 g | |
| Price | — | $114 |
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 6.5" PLS TFT
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A03
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G and the Samsung Galaxy A03 are nearly equal (24/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100.
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is a bit better (63/100 vs 55/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A03 or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The ZTE Blade A75 4G edges out the Samsung Galaxy A03 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A03 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy A03 has a MobileRank rating of 16/100, the ZTE Blade A75 4G — 25/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A03 over the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy A03 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A75 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.