Motorola Moto E14 vs Samsung Galaxy A03
Comparing the Motorola Moto E14 (2024) and the Samsung Galaxy A03 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Moto E14 leads — 20/100 vs 16/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 48 MP; the Motorola Moto E14 is noticeably lighter (178g vs 196g).
Motorola Moto E14
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Lighter: 178g vs 196g
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (77/100 vs 55/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Better main camera: 48MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (23/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Motorola Moto E14 vs the Samsung Galaxy A03, the Motorola Moto E14 scores 4 points higher (20/100 vs 16/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 leads (23/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto E14 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto E14 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 (23/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100. In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto E14 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (77/100 vs 55/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto E14 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Motorola Moto E14 | Samsung Galaxy A03 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T606 | — | |
| AnTuTu | 330006 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 378 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1335 | — | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.5" PLS TFT | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 48 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 4GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14 (Go edition) | Android 11 | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 163.5×74.5×8.0 mm | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 178 g | 196 g | |
| Price | $79 | — |
Motorola Moto E14
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Motorola Moto E14
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 6.5" PLS TFT
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Motorola Moto E14
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A03
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Moto E14 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 notably outperforms the Motorola Moto E14 (23/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto E14 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (77/100 vs 55/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Moto E14 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Moto E14 or the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The Motorola Moto E14 edges out the Samsung Galaxy A03 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Moto E14 and the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The Motorola Moto E14 has a MobileRank rating of 20/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03 — 16/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Moto E14 or the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The Samsung Galaxy A03 leads on camera score (23/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Moto E14 over the Samsung Galaxy A03?
The Motorola Moto E14 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A03 is a better fit for everyday use.