Infinix Hot 60 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G
The Infinix Hot 60 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7020, while the ZTE Blade A75 4G (2024) runs on the Unisoc T606; estimated prices are $120 and $114. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix Hot 60 leads — 33/100 vs 25/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix Hot 60 has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Infinix Hot 60 is faster in AnTuTu (806,012 vs 330,006); the ZTE Blade A75 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Infinix Hot 60 doesn't.
Infinix Hot 60
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Higher AnTuTu: 806012 vs 330006
- Better Geekbench Single: 1061 vs 378
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2398 vs 1335
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 18W vs 5W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (1/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (42/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Lighter: 189g vs 193g
- Cheaper: $114 vs $120
- Better design/ergonomics (63/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the Infinix Hot 60 vs the ZTE Blade A75 4G, the Infinix Hot 60 scores 8 points higher (33/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Infinix Hot 60 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix Hot 60 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100. In the "battery" category, the Infinix Hot 60 is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is a bit better (63/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Infinix Hot 60 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | 806012 | 330006 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2398 | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 700 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 166.0×76.8×7.8 mm | 164.1×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 193 g | 189 g | |
| Price | $120 | $114 |
Infinix Hot 60
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Infinix Hot 60
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Infinix Hot 60
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
We compared Infinix Hot 60 and ZTE Blade A75 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Infinix Hot 60 leads ZTE Blade A75 4G by 144.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $6. ZTE Blade A75 4G is cheaper by $6.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Infinix Hot 60 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix Hot 60 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix Hot 60 is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is a bit better (63/100 vs 58/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Infinix Hot 60 or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Infinix Hot 60 edges out the ZTE Blade A75 4G by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Infinix Hot 60 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Infinix Hot 60 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the ZTE Blade A75 4G — 25/100.
Should you choose the Infinix Hot 60 over the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Infinix Hot 60 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade A75 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.