Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC vs ZTE Blade A75 4G
The Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (2022) runs on the Unisoc T610, while the ZTE Blade A75 4G (2024) runs on the Unisoc T606. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade A75 4G leads — 25/100 vs 17/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the ZTE Blade A75 4G is noticeably lighter (189g vs 209g).
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 36/100)
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 189g vs 209g
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (63/100 vs 38/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC vs the ZTE Blade A75 4G, the ZTE Blade A75 4G scores 8 points higher (25/100 vs 17/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC is a bit better (45/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (63/100 vs 38/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC | ZTE Blade A75 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T610 | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 330006 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 5W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 10 | Android 13 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 171.0×78.0×8.9 mm | 164.1×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 189 g | |
| Price | — | $114 |
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
- Main: 13MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
- 6000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC is a bit better (45/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (63/100 vs 38/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The ZTE Blade A75 4G edges out the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC and the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the ZTE Blade A75 4G — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The ZTE Blade A75 4G leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC over the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Infinix Hot 12 Play NFC is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A75 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.