Samsung Galaxy A03 vs Vivo X300 Pro
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A03 (2022) and the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 43/100 (a 44-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A03 is noticeably lighter (196g vs 226g).
Samsung Galaxy A03
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 196g vs 226g
- Better portability (50/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A03 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 44 points higher (87/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (96/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A03 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.5" PLS TFT | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 196 g | 226 g | |
| Price | — | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 6.5" PLS TFT
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Samsung Galaxy A03
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (84/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (96/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (81/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A03 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 by 44 points (87/100 vs 43/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A03 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A03 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A03 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A03 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy A03 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.