Samsung Galaxy A03 vs Vivo X Fold6
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A03 (2022) and the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 43/100 (a 45-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 doesn't; the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 9.1mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A03
Vivo X Fold6
What makes Samsung Galaxy A03 better?
- Overall rating 43/100
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
- Bigger battery: 6900 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Better camera (87/100 vs 29/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A03 vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 45 points higher (88/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 66/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (81/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (87/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (82/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (100/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A03 | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3455738 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.5" PLS TFT | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 50W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | 196 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | $1900 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 6.5" PLS TFT
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A03
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A03
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (81/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (87/100 vs 29/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (82/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 (100/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A03 or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 by 45 points (88/100 vs 43/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A03 and the Vivo X Fold6?
The Samsung Galaxy A03 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A03 or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A03 over the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.