Samsung Galaxy A03 Core vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (2022) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $100 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 24/100 (a 63-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 153,667); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is noticeably lighter (196g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 63 points (87/100 vs 24/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
Performance 9
Display 32
Camera 10
Battery 66
Portability 50
Value for money 32
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Samsung Galaxy A03 Core better?
  • Lighter: 196g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $899

  • Better portability (50/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 153667
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 846
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 9/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 63 points higher (87/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 66/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 32/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (93/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (84/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100).

Samsung Galaxy A03 Core: The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A03 Core Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Unisoc SC9863A Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 153667 3269794
Geekbench Single 205 3228
Geekbench Multi 846 9553
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2800
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 90W
Wireless charging 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 8 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 5 MP 32 MP
RAM 2GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 196 g 226 g
Launch price $100 $899
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • Main: 8MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
66
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A03 Core and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A03 Core Unisoc SC9863A
24/100
153667 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +95.3%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 95.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
$100
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $799. Samsung Galaxy A03 Core was $799 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (93/100 vs 9/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (84/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (96/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (81/100 vs 66/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 63 points (87/100 vs 24/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core has a MobileRank rating of 24/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 9/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.