Samsung Galaxy A03 Core vs Vivo X Fold6

The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (2022) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $100 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 24/100 (a 64-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 153,667); the Vivo X Fold6 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core doesn't; the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 9.1mm).

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 64 points (88/100 vs 24/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
Performance 9
Display 32
Camera 10
Battery 66
Portability 50
Value for money 32
Vivo X Fold6
Performance 94
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 80
What makes Samsung Galaxy A03 Core better?
  • Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $1900

  • Overall rating 24/100
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 153667
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 846
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 9/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 64 points higher (88/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (94/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 66/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 32/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (94/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (81/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (87/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (82/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (100/100 vs 50/100).

Samsung Galaxy A03 Core: The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy A03 Core Vivo X Fold6
Processor Unisoc SC9863A MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 153667 3485039
Geekbench Single 205 3228
Geekbench Multi 846 9553
Display 6.5" IPS LCD 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2480x2200
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 80W
Wireless charging 50W
Main camera 8 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 5 MP 20 MP
RAM 2GB 16GB
Storage 32GB 512GB
OS Android 15
Brightness (peak) 5500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 196 g
Launch price $100 $1900
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • Main: 8MP
  • Front: 5MP
10
camera
Vivo X Fold6
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • 6.5" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
32
display
Vivo X Fold6
  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
66
battery
Vivo X Fold6
  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy A03 Core and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy A03 Core Unisoc SC9863A
24/100
153667 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100 +95.6%
3485039 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 95.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
$100
Vivo X Fold6
$1900

Launch price difference: $1800. Samsung Galaxy A03 Core was $1800 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (94/100 vs 9/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (81/100 vs 32/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (87/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (82/100 vs 66/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (100/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 64 points (88/100 vs 24/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core has a MobileRank rating of 24/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (94/100 vs 9/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.