Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 60/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max has the bigger battery (9210 mAh vs 7000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,010,104).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Redmi Note 17 Pro Max better?
- Bigger battery: 9210 vs 7000 mAh
- Overall rating 60/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1010104
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1099
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3481
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 59/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 80/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 35/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 31 points higher (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (99/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (39/100 vs 35/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 17 Pro Max | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1010104 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1099 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3481 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2772 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 9210 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.5×78.3×8.6 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- 9210 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 17 Pro Max and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Redmi Note 17 Pro Max by 76.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (99/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (96/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (39/100 vs 35/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max by 31 points (91/100 vs 60/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 17 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 17 Pro Max is a better fit for those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.