Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 60/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max has the bigger battery (9210 mAh vs 7000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,012,134).
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Bigger battery: 9210 vs 7000 mAh
- Overall rating 60/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1012134
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1180
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3501
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 80/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 35/100)
Comparing the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 31 points higher (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (99/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (39/100 vs 35/100).
| Specification | Redmi Note 17 Pro Max | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1012134 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1180 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3501 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2772 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 9210 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.5×78.3×8.6 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- 9210 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Redmi Note 17 Pro Max and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Redmi Note 17 Pro Max by 76.2% in our overall performance rating.
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (99/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (96/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (39/100 vs 35/100).
Which is better: the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max by 31 points (91/100 vs 60/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 17 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Redmi Note 17 Pro Max is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.