Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 60/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max has the bigger battery (9210 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,010,104).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Redmi Note 17 Pro Max better?
- Bigger battery: 9210 vs 6510 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Overall rating 60/100
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1010104
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1099
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3481
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 226g vs 230g
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 59/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 35/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 28 points higher (88/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (94/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 35/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 17 Pro Max | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1010104 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1099 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3481 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2772 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 9210 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.5×78.3×8.6 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- 9210 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 17 Pro Max and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Redmi Note 17 Pro Max by 69.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (94/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (96/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 35/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max by 28 points (88/100 vs 60/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Redmi Note 17 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Redmi Note 17 Pro Max is a better fit for those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.