Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 6 Gen 5, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 60/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max has the bigger battery (9210 mAh vs 6150); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,150,555 vs 1,010,104); the Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably lighter (207g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Redmi Note 17 Pro Max better?
- Bigger battery: 9210 vs 6150 mAh
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 73/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3150555 vs 1010104
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1099
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3481
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 207g vs 230g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 59/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 40/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (55/100 vs 35/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 24 points higher (84/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (91/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (99/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (78/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max is a bit better (80/100 vs 73/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (55/100 vs 35/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Redmi Note 17 Pro Max | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 6 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1010104 | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1099 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3481 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2772 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 9210 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.5×78.3×8.6 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | — | $650 |
Camera comparison
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
- 9210 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Redmi Note 17 Pro Max and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 13 leads Redmi Note 17 Pro Max by 67.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Redmi Note 17 Pro Max
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (91/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (99/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (78/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max is a bit better (80/100 vs 73/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max (55/100 vs 35/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max by 24 points (84/100 vs 60/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Redmi Note 17 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Redmi Note 17 Pro Max over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Redmi Note 17 Pro Max is a better fit for those who care about battery life. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.