Redmi Note 14 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

The Redmi Note 14 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $199 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 49/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5110); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 660,807); the Redmi Note 14 is noticeably lighter (190g vs 309g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 by 20 points (69/100 vs 49/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Redmi Note 14

Performance 49
Display 79
Camera 30
Battery 48
Portability 65
Value for money 60

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

Performance 90
Display 70
Camera 52
Battery 63
Portability 20
Value for money 46

What makes Redmi Note 14 better?

  • Lighter: 190g vs 309g
  • Cheaper at launch: $199 vs $2899

  • Better display (79/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better portability (65/100 vs 20/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 660807
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 969
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2321
  • Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5110 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 49/100)
  • Better camera (52/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (63/100 vs 48/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi Note 14 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 20 points higher (69/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Redmi Note 14 — 60/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (90/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 14 is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (63/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 14 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (65/100 vs 20/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold: The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Redmi Note 14 Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 660807 2926532
Geekbench Single 969 3013
Geekbench Multi 2321 9287
Display 6.7" AMOLED 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2400x1080 2160x1584
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5110 mAh 5600 mAh
Charging 33W 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 84 —
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 16 MP 10 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 512GB
OS Android 14 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 2100 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP48
Dimensions 162.4×75.7×8.0 mm 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm
Weight 190 g 309 g
Launch price $199 $2899

Camera comparison

Redmi Note 14

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
30
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
52
camera

Display comparison

Redmi Note 14

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
70
display

Battery and charging

Redmi Note 14

  • 5110 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
63
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Redmi Note 14 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi Note 14 MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra
49/100
660807 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
69/100 +77.4%
2926532 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Redmi Note 14 by 77.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Redmi Note 14

$199

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

$2899

Launch price difference: $2700. Redmi Note 14 was $2700 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (90/100 vs 49/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Redmi Note 14 is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (52/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Redmi Note 14 (63/100 vs 48/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Redmi Note 14 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (65/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Redmi Note 14 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Redmi Note 14 by 20 points (69/100 vs 49/100).

What is the rating of the Redmi Note 14 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Redmi Note 14 has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi Note 14 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Redmi Note 14 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 49/100).

Should you choose the Redmi Note 14 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.